The submitted manuscript will undergo a rigorous and structured blind peer review process to ensure its academic quality, originality, and alignment with the conference’s focus and scope. The review process begins with an initial screening conducted by the editorial team, which evaluates the manuscript based on formatting compliance, relevance to the conference’s focus and scope, and originality of content. Manuscripts that pass this initial screening are then forwarded to at least two reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. In accordance with the double-blind review policy, the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the evaluation to ensure impartiality and academic integrity. Upon completion of the review, the reviewers’ comments and recommendations are carefully examined by the editorial team to determine one of the following outcomes: acceptance without revision, acceptance with minor revision, or a request for major revision. Authors will receive formal notification via email, including the editorial decision and detailed reviewer feedback intended to support the improvement of the manuscript. If revisions are required, specific instructions and deadlines will be provided. The process concludes with a final confirmation email sent to the author, indicating the completion of the review procedure. This comprehensive review system is implemented to uphold high scholarly standards and ensure that all accepted contributions meet the expectations of an international academic forum.